(1.) The applicants have sought clarification of the judgment dated 14-8-2003 passed in the matter of Islamic Academy of Education and another v. Suite of Karnataka and others, which has since been reported in 2003 (6) SCC 697. The clarification which has been sought in this application pertains to the right of the management of private unaided colleges to admit NRI/foreign students up to 15% of the seats reserved for the management quota and to allow them to have a separate system of judging the merit of such students and to have fees fixed as far as the students were concerned.
(2.) The State respondents have opposed the application on the ground that Committee which was set up pursuant to the decision of this Court in Islamic Academy of Education (supra) had not been made party to these proceedings. It is further submitted that any order on this application might involve a modification of the decision of the five-Judge Bench and this Court should not therefore entertain the application. The third submission is that since the main application had been disposed of on 18th December, 2003, there was no scope of filing any interim application at this stage. Reliance has also been placed on the decision of this Court in State of U. P. v. Brahm Dutt Sharma, reported in 1987 (2) SCC 179, paragraph 10.
(3.) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants has pointed out that the Committee was not functioning as the retired High Court Judge who had been appointed to head the Committee had resigned. It is also pointed out that the applicant was not a party to the decision in Islamic academy Education and, therefore, entitled to file an application for clarification of that judgment.