REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

ANIL KUMAR Appellant

V/S

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

MOHAN RAI BHARATH RAI VS. STATE OF BIHAR IN BOTH APPEALS [REFERRED TO]
RAMLAGAN SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
SHIVAJI SAHABRAO BOBADE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
LAKSHMI SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
HARE KRISHNA STNGH RAM KUMAR UPADHYA PARAS NATH SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
VIJAYEESINGH STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH BABULAL DOSHI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
JASWANT SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
BHAGWAN SINGH VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. KARNAIL SINGH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. POHLA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
RAJ KISHORE JHA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
SUCHAND PAL VS. PHANI PAL [REFERRED TO]
SURENDRA PASWAN VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Acquittal of the appellant (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused') by the trial Court was reversed by the High Court by the impugned judgment. Three persons, namely, Akshay Kumar, Anil Kumar and Shiv Kumar faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 302 and 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC').

(2.) Accusations which led to the trial of the accused persons are essentially as follows:

(3.) Rakesh Kumar has since died. Govardhan Lal, the complainant was examined as PW-1, Kallo as PW-2 and Ram Beti as PW-3.

Click here to view full judgment.

ANIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address