DIGVIJAY MOTE Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These Writ Petitions have been preferred by way of Public Interest Litigation for the enforcement of fundamental rights, political rights and fundamental duties of the people and electorate-citizens of India under, inter alia, Articles 14 and 19 read with Articles 326 and 51-A and various statutory provisions.

(2.) The following prayers are made before us in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 385 of 1993:-

(3.) The petitioner claims to be an active social worker. He further claims that he is a keen observer of the electoral process in the Republic of India. This petition has been preferred in public interest with the sole object of cleansing the existing electoral process and to contest the election. The petitioner has every prospect of winning the election.