BABU LAL Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal arises under the provisions of the Supreme Court Enlargement of Criminal Jurisdiction Act. There are three appellants. They were tried for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34, IPC. The State preferred an appeal against the order of acquittal and the High Court interfered and convicted all the three under Section 302 read with Section 34, IPC and sentenced each of them to undergo imprisonment for life. The prosecution case is as follows :

(2.) In the appeal, the High Court also held that these eye-witnesses were present and to that extent confirmed the finding of the trial Court. The High Court, however, disagreed with the trial Judge that the medical evidence was in conflict with the direct testimony and also held that the right of private defence had been wrongly given to A-2.

(3.) XX XX XX