RAM PRASAD NARAYAN SAHI Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I concur in the judgment which my learned brother Mukherjea is about to deliver, but I wish to add a few words in view of the important constitutional issue involved.

(2.) The facts are simple. The appellants obtained a settlement of about 200 bighas of land in a village known as Sathi Farm in Bettiah Estate, in Bihar, then and ever since in the management of the Court of Wards on behalf of the disqualified proprietress who is the second respondent in this appeal. The lands were settled at the prevailing rate of rent but the salami or premium payable was fixed at half the usual rate as a concession to the appellants who are said to be distant relations of the proprietress. The appellants paid the salami and entered into possession of the lands on the 2nd November 1946 and have since been paying the rents regularly. On the 13th June 1950 the Bihar Legislature passed an Act called the Sathi Lands (Restoration) Act, 1950. The genesis of this legislation is thus explained in the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the State of Bihar, the first respondent herein.

(3.) The statement of objects and reasons of the Sathi Lands (Resteration) Bill runs thus: