(1.) The appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under Ss. 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, 'IPC'). He was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Sec. 302 and rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence punishable under Sec. 201, IPC. Sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The appeal preferred by the appellant has been dismissed by the High Court by the impugned judgment.
(2.) The deceased Shanthi was the wife of the appellant. According to the prosecution case, the appellant suspected that the deceased had illicit intimacy with one Peethambaram. On 29/5/2006 at about 9:00 p.m., the appellant took the deceased to the bank of Ponnai River and assaulted her with a stick. The said Shanthi succumbed to the injuries. He buried the dead body in the same place. PW Nos.3 and 4 are the parents of the deceased who were enquiring with the appellant about the whereabouts of the deceased. However, the appellant told them that the deceased was missing.
(3.) The prosecution relied upon the extrajudicial confession made by the appellant before PW1 Ganesan Perumal in the presence of PW2 Tyagarajan Kannan. Secondly, the prosecution relied upon the recovery of the dead body and the stick allegedly used as a weapon of assault at the instance of the appellant. Thirdly, according to the prosecution, the skeleton was identified by PW nos.3 and 4 on the basis of the clothes thereon.