LAWS(SC)-2023-1-101

SANJIV KUMAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

Decided On January 24, 2023
Sanjiv Kumar Singh Appellant
V/S
STATE OF BIHAR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner as also the learned counsel for the respondents and perused the petition papers.

(2.) The petitioner is assailing the order dtd. 18/8/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11593 of 2022.

(3.) In a matter where the petitioner was before the High Court seeking a direction to the respondent no.2/ District Magistrate, East-Champaran, Motihari, Bihar to grant 'No Objection Certificate' (NOC) for starting MS/HSD retail outlet dealership over land situated in Khata No.544, Plot No.1077, Thana No. 196, Tauzi No. 951, Ward No.37 in Mauza Chhota Bariyarpur, Police Station Chhatauni, Motihar, District-East Champaran, Bihar, the District Magistrate had rejected the request of the petitioner for issue of NOC. The said order being assailed before the High Court, the High Court has also dismissed the petition only on the ground that the respondents herein had contended that as against the decree passed in favour of the petitioner in respect of the said judgment and decree dtd. 25/8/2021, an appeal has been filed before the High Court and the same is yet to come up for hearing. From the documents produced along with the counter affidavit, the respondents have produced the extract of the present case status of FA-16/2022. It is pointed out that the appeal is filed on 11/3/2022 which was registered on 15/3/2022 and the scrutiny for posting the appeal before the Court is yet to be completed. Though, such contention is put forth by the respondents, keeping in view the provisions as contained in Order 41 Rule 5 of CPC, unless the appeal is listed and there is an interim order, the mere filing of the appeal would not operate as a stay. If that be so, the judgment and decree dtd. 25/8/2021 would enure to the benefit of the petitioner as on today and the rejection of the NOC only on the ground that the appeal has been filed, would not be justified. In that view, the High Court was also not justified in rejecting the petition.