LAWS(SC)-2023-2-105

SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Decided On February 03, 2023
Satender Kumar Antil Appellant
V/S
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learned senior counsel submits that while a large number of High Courts have filed their compliance report, no compliance report has been filed by the High Courts of Andhra Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, Rajasthan and Tripura. Learned counsel appearing for the High Court of Tripura submits that he filed it yesterday and naturally it is not on record. Learned counsel appearing for the High Courts of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh and Rajasthan request for a week's time to file the report. High Court of Andhra Pradesh is unrepresented. Let notice be issued to the Registrar of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh as to why no arrangement has been made for representation before this Court.

(2.) Now turning to the states which are yet to file the compliance report. It appears that hardly any of the states have filed the report. The States who have not filed or at least not given a copy to Mr. Sidharth Luthra's office are thirty in number, which are as under:-

(3.) The CBI has also not filed compliance report.