(1.) This appeal has been preferred by defendant No.3 against the judgment dated 20th January, 2003 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in R.F.A. No.319 of 1998. By the impugned judgment and decree the High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment and decree of trial court and decreed the suit declaring that defendant Nos.1,2,3 and 4 are entitled to 11/50th share each and the plaintiff, defendant Nos.5,6,7,8 and 9 are entitled to 1/50th share each in the suit schedule properties.
(2.) The facts of the case are as follows:
(3.) Plaintiff claimed that the suit schedule properties are selfacquired properties of late Shri Kunnaiah and, therefore, she is entitled for 1/10th share in the suit schedule properties.