REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

SUSHIL KUMAR Appellant

V/S

RAKESH KUMAR Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

CHITTARANJAN DAS V. DURGAPORE PROJECT LIMITED AND ORS. [REFFERED]
DURGA SHANKAR MEHTA VS. RAGHURAL SINGH [REFFERED (PARA 8.2) 13.]
BADAT AND CO BOMBAY VS. EAST INDIA TRADING CO [REFFERED (PARA 7.2) 12.]
BRIJ MOHAN SINGH VS. PRIYA BRAT NARAIN SINHA [REFFERED (PARA 11.2) 11.]
AMRIT LAL AMBALAL PATEL VS. HIMATHBHAI GOMANBHAI PATEL ANA ANOTHER [REFFERED (PARA 8.1) 9.]
R M SESHADRI VS. G VASANTHA PAI [REFFERED (PARA 18.10) 10.]
UNION OF INDIA VS. SUGAULI SUGAR WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED [REFFERED (PARA 10.4) 8.]
COX AND KINGS AGENTS LIMITED VS. THEIR WORKMEN [REFFERED (PARA 10.4) 6.]
THIRU JOHN V SUBRAHMANYAM VS. RETURNING OFFICER:RETURNING OFFICER [REFFERED (PARA 17.2) 7.]
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LIMITED NEW DELHI VS. JUGAL KISHORE [REFFERED (PARA 19.1) 5.]
BIRAD MAL SINGHVI VS. ANAND PUROHIT [REFFERED (PARA 8.3) 4.]
ORISSA MINING CORPORATION VS. ANANDA CHANDRA PRUSTY [REFFERED (PARA 10.3) 3.]
PUNIT RAI VS. DINESH CHAUDHARY [REFFERED (PARA 15.5) 2.]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) . This appeal under section 116-A of the Representation of People Act, 1951 arises out of a judgment and order dated 7.8.2002 passed by the High Court of Patna in election petition no.3 of 2002 whereby and whereunder the election petition filed by the appellant herein was dismissed. THE FACTUAL BACKGROUND :

(2.) . The parties hereto together with other candidates filed their respective nomination papers for election to the Bihar Legislative Assembly from 181 Parbatta constituency.

(3.) . The High Court having regard to the rival contentions raised in the respective pleadings of the parties framed the following issues:

Click here to view full judgment.

SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. RAKESH KUMAR

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address