REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

JAVED Appellant

V/S

STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

SMT. R.A. PATHAN V. DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND ORS. [REFERRED]
N P PONNUSWAMI THE UNION OF INDIA AND STATE OF MADHYA BHARAT VS. RETURNING OFFICER NAMAKKAL CONSTITUENCY NAMAKKAL SALEM DIST :RETURNING OFFICER NAMAKKAL CONSTITUENCY NAMAKKAL SALEM DIST [REFERRED]
JAGAN NATH VS. JASWANT SINGH [REFERRED]
JAMUNA PRASAD MUKHARIYA VS. LACHHI RAM [REFERRED]
SAKHAWANT ALL VS. STATE OF ORISSA [REFERRED]
BUDHAN CHOUDHRY VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED]
RAI SAHIB RAM JAWAYA KAPUR VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED]
MOHAMMAD HANIF QUARESHI 2 MOHAMMAD ILLIAS 3 GHANI MAHAJAN AND 4 NASIR UD DIN 5 SHEIKH HUSSAIN QUARESHI 6 SHEIKH SUBHAN 7 ABDUL AZIZ 8 MOHAMMAD ISMAIL AND 9 ABDUL RAHIM 10 ABDUL VS. STATE OF BIHAR 2 STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH 3 STATE OF BOMBAY 4 STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 5 STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED]
BAR COUNCIL OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED]
MANEKA GANDHI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED]
KASTURI LAL LAKSHMI REDDY REPRE SENTED VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED]
AIR INDIA LIMITED VS. NERGESH MEERZA [REFERRED]
JYOTI BASU VS. DEBI GHOSAL [REFERRED]
MOHAMMAD AHMED KHAN VS. SHAH BANG BEGUM [REFERRED]
PRABHAKARAN NAIR VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU ANT [REFERRED]
L N MTSHRA INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL CHANGE PATNA DR JAGADANAND JHA DR JAGADANAND JHA L N MISHRA INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL CHANGE PATNA L N MISHRA INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL CHAN VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED]
M ISMAIL FARUQUI MOHD ASLAM HARGYAN SINGH THAKUR VIJAY RAGHO BHAGWAN BIRAJMANMANDIR JAMIAT ULAMA E HIND VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED]
STATE OF TAMIL NADU VS. ANANTHI AMMAL [REFERRED]
SARLA MUDGAL PRESIDENT KALYANI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED]
PANNALAL BANSILAL PITTI VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED]
RAM PRASAD SETH VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED]
STATE OF BOMBAY VS. NARASU APPA MALI [REFERRED]
BADRUDDIN VS. AISHA BEGUM [REFERRED]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.

(2.) In this batch of writ petitions and appeals the core issue is the vires of the provisions of Sections 175(1)(q) and 177(1) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (Act No. 11 of 1994) (hereinafter referred to as the Act, for short). The relevant provisions are extracted and reproduced hereunder:-

(3.) Act No. 11 of 1994 was enacted with various objectives based on past experience and in view of the shortcomings noticed in the implementation of preceding laws and also to bring the legislation in conformity with Part IX of the Constitution of India relating to 'The Panchayats' added by the Seventy-third Amendment. One of the objectives set out in the Statement of Objects and Reasons is to disqualify persons for election of Panchayats at each level, having more than 2 children after one year of the date of commencement of this Act, to popularize Family Welfare/Family Planning Programme (vide Clause (m) of Para 4 of SOR).

Click here to view full judgment.

JAVED Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address