(1.) This appeal is against the judgment dated 8.1.1998.
(2.) Briefly stated the facts are as follows:
(3.) It must be mentioned that under the contract the material was to be supplied before the end of September 1990. There was some delay in supply. However, the respondent supplied the quantity by March 1991. Instead of supplying one lakh 500 ml containers he supplied two lakh 250 ml containers. The same was accepted by the appellants.