BHAWANI SHANKAR SHARMA Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The appellant-plaintiff was working as an Assistant Surveyor of Works in the Chief Engineer's Office, Southern Command, Poona-1 from November 1953, to July 1955. On November 22, 1953, the Chief Engineer served an order on him intimating him that he neither showed interest in the work nor applied himself sufficiently. Thereafter by another order dated January 11, 1954, the Chief Engineer informed him that as his work was found to be unsatisfactory, it was proposed to withhold the grant of annual increment which fell due to him on August 7, 1953, which increment would have entitled him to cross the efficiency bar at Rupees 590/- per month. The appellant was called upon to make representation against the proposed order. He made a representation against the proposed order. He pleaded that his performance was not below normal. He further stated in his representation that he was unable to make a proper representation as he was not informed of the basis on which the Chief Engineer came to the conclusion that he was inefficient in his work. The Government after considering the representation made by the appellant ordered stopping him crossing the efficiency bar. The appellant's representation against that order was not accepted. Thereafter the appellant filed a suit from which this appeal has arisen challenging the validity of the order made by the Government.

(2.) The trial Court dismissed the suit and that decision has been affirmed by the High Court.

(3.) The only contention urged on behalf of the appellant in this Court was that the impugned order was invalid inasmuch as the appellant was not granted a reasonable opportunity to which he was entitled under Rule 16 of the Civilians in Defence Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1952. Rule 13 of those Rules prescribes that withholding of an increment is a punishment. That rule nowhere refers to the stopping of the crossing of the efficiency bar. Rule 16 says: