LAWS(SC)-2022-11-25

JANHIT ABHIYAN Vs. UNION OF INDIA

Decided On November 07, 2022
Janhit Abhiyan Appellant
V/S
UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ORDER

(2.) In a very brief outline of the forthcoming discussion, it could be noticed that the challenge to the amendment in question is premised essentially on three - fold grounds: first, that making of special provisions including reservation in education and employment on the basis of economic criteria is entirely impermissible and offends the basic structure of the Constitution; second, that in any case, exclusion of socially and educationally backward classes[6] i.e., SCs, STs and non - creamy layer OBCs from the benefit of these special provisions for EWS is inexplicably discriminatory and destroys the basic structure of the Constitution; and third, that providing for ten per cent. additional reservation directly breaches the fifty per cent. ceiling of reservations already settled by the decisions of this Court and hence, results in unacceptable abrogation of the Equality Code which, again, destroys the basic structure of the Constitution. Per contra, it is maintained on behalf of the sides opposing this challenge that the amendment in question, empowering the State to make special provisions for the economically weaker Sec. of citizens, is squarely within the four corners of the Constitution of India; rather making of such provisions is necessary to achieve the Preambular goal of 'JUSTICE, social, economic and political' in real sense of terms. It is also asserted that there is no discrimination in relation to the classes that are excluded from EWS for the simple reason that the existing special provisions of affirmative action in their relation continue to remain in operation. As regards the breach of fifty per cent. ceiling of reservations, the contention is that the said ceiling is not inflexible or inviolable and in the context of the object sought to be achieved, ten per cent. has been provided as the maximum by way of the enabling provision.

(3.) With the foregoing outline, we may usefully take note of the reference made to the Constitution Bench for determination of the substantial questions of interpretation of the Constitution, as are involved in these matters and the questions formulated while commencing the hearing.