REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

BIMAL KUMAR Appellant

V/S

SHAKUNTALA DEBI Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

MUZAFFAR HUSAIN V. SHARAFAT HUSSAIN [REFERRED TO]
YESHWANT DEORAO VS. WALCHAND RAMCHAND [REFERRED TO]
RATANSINGH VS. VIJAYSINGH [REFERRED TO]
RENU DEVI VS. MAHENDRA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
RACHAKONDA VENKAT RAO VS. R SATYA BAI [REFERRED TO]
RACHAKONDA VENKAT RAO VS. R SATYA BAI [REFERRED TO]
CHIRANJI LAL VS. HARI DAS [REFERRED TO]
RAM BACHAN RAI VS. RAM UDAR RAI [REFERRED TO]
HASHAM ABBAS SAYYAD VS. USMAN ABBAS SAYYAD [REFERRED TO]
MANOHAR SHANKAR NALE VS. JAIPALSING SHIVLALSING RAJPUT [REFERRED TO]
BIKOBA DEORA GAIKWAD VS. HIRABAI MARUTIRAO GHORGARE [REFERRED TO]
BHARATI DEVI VS. FAGU MAHTO [REFERRED TO]
RAGHUBIR SAHU VS. AJODHYA SAHU [REFERRED TO]
THIRUVENGADATHAMIAH VS. MUNGIAH [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) In this appeal, the assail is to the order dated 19.9.2009 passed by the learned single Judge of Jharkhand High Court at Ranchi in C.R. No. 53 of 2007 by which he has dislodged the order dated 10.7.2006 passed by the learned Sub-Judge (I), Ranchi, whereby he had dismissed2 the Execution Case No. 8 of 2004 filed by the respondents as being barred by limitation.

(3.) Filtering the unnecessary details, the facts which are requisite to be frescoed for the purpose of disposal of the present appeal are that one Kanilal Kasera filed a Partition Suit No. 131 of 1962 against his father, Nanak Kasera, and other brothers. The suit was compromised leaving aside Kishori Lal Kasera, the father of the present appellants, and a joint petition of compromise between the plaintiff and the defendant Nos. 1, 2, 4 to 9 and 11 to 18 was filed. It is worth noting that Kishori Lal Kasera had appeared in the suit and filed the written statement but thereafter chose not to contest.

Click here to view full judgment.

BIMAL KUMAR Vs. SHAKUNTALA DEBI

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address