REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

VISHWANATH SITARAM AGRAWAL Appellant

V/S

SARLA VISHWANATH AGRAWAL Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

N G DASTANE VS. S DASTANE [REFERRED TO]
SIRAJMOHMEDKHAN JANMOHAMADKHAN VS. HAFIZUNNISA YASINK HAN [REFERRED TO]
SHOBHA RANI VS. MADHUKAR REDDI [REFERRED TO]
V BHAGAT VS. D BHAGAT MRS [REFERRED TO]
MAJOR SINGH VS. RATTAN SINGH [REFERRED TO]
VIDHYADHAR VS. MANKIKRAO [REFERRED TO]
KULWANT KAUR VS. GURDIAL SINGH MANN [REFERRED TO]
PRANEEN MEHTA VS. INDERJIT MEHTA [REFERRED TO]
VIJAYKUMAR RAMCHANDRA BHATE VS. NEELA VIJAYKUMAR BHATE [REFERRED TO]
A JAYACHANDRA VS. ANEEL KAUR [REFERRED TO]
GOVINDARAJU VS. MARIAMAN [REFERRED TO]
VINITA SAXENA VS. PANKAJ PANDIT [REFERRED TO]
SAMAR GHOSH VS. JAYA GHOSH [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL RAHEEM VS. KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY BOARD [REFERRED TO]
SUMAN KAPUR VS. SUDHIR KAPUR [REFERRED TO]
ALAMELU VS. STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE [REFERRED TO]
HEINZ INDIA PVT LTD VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
PANCHO VS. RAM PRASAD [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) The marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on the 30th of April, 1979 as per the Hindu rites at Akola. In the wedlock, two sons, namely, Vishal and Rahul, were born on 23.9.1982 and 1.11.1984 respectively. As the appellant-husband felt that there was total discord in their marital life and compatibility looked like a mirage, he filed a petition for divorce under Section 13(1) (ia) of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for brevity 'the Act').

(3.) It was the case of the appellant before the court of first instance that the respondent-wife did not know how to conduct herself as a wife and daughter-in-law and despite persuasion, her behavioural pattern remained unchanged. The birth of the children had no impact on her conduct and everything worsened with the efflux of time. The behaviour of the respondent with the relatives and guests who used to come to their house was far from being desirable and, in fact, it exhibited arrogance and lack of culture and, in a way, endangered the social reputation of the family. That apart, she did not have the slightest respect for her mother-in-law. Despite the old lady being a patient of diabetes and hyper tension, it could not invoke any sympathy from the respondent and hence, there was total absence of care or concern.

Click here to view full judgment.

VISHWANATH SITARAM AGRAWAL Vs. SARLA VISHWANATH AGRAWAL

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address