MOHD ALTAF Vs. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) MR Parag P. Tripathi, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent 1, U.P. Public Service Commission (for short "the Public Service Commission") submits that in compliance with the order dated 10-1-2001 (Mohd. Altaf (1) v. U.P. Public Service Commission, 2008 (14) SCC 139), the Public Service Commission has prepared a list of eligible candidates which is produced before us today in court and is reproduced as under:

(2.) MR Tripathi submits that the said list consists of a number of other persons who have not preferred any appeal or petition before this Court and he seeks a clarification whether the order passed by this Court would be applicable to them or not. In our view, our order is passed on an interpretation of the statutory rules and therefore, it would be applicable to all concerned who appeared in the interview on the relevant date.

(3.) IN our view, this submission cannot be accepted in view of the regulations framed by the State Government as mentioned in Appendix A to the said regulations which provide that higher classes mean classes from IX to XII and experience of teaching these classes is admissible for the post of Headmaster of Intermediate College. This is also clarified by the State Government by issuing circular dated 12-4-1973.