RAGHUNATH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) , J.

(2.) THESE two appeals arise out of a common judgment and order passed by the learned additional sessions judge, Gurgaon, convicting the appellants in sessions case no. 32 of 1995 and sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment on the following sections of law as under: <FRM>JUDGEMENT_556_JT9_2002Html1.htm</FRM> The substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. By the aforesaid judgment all the nine accused have been convicted. The convictions and sentences have been confirmed by the High Court. Criminal appeal no. 73 of 2002 is preferred by accused Raghunath and criminal appeal no. 74 of 2002 is preferred by the remaining eight accused, namely, Ram Kishan s/o. Ram Pat, Anil @ Ajay Kumar s/o Ram Kishan, Manohar Lal s/o. Bohru, Desh Raj s/o. Ram Pat, Siri Chand s/o Bohru, Satish s/o. Siri Chand, Sunil s/o Ram Kishan and Jagmal s/o. Ram Pat.

(3.) THE prosecution case, as revealed in the FIR, was set in motion on receipt of information received from Badshahpur police station through wireless that there was a fight in village Teekli and the injured were admitted in the hospital. On the basis of the said information, ASI Bhup Singh had noted the farad bayan. After recording the statement of the complainant party, a prima facie case was found and a case under sections 148, 323/302/325/452/436/427 read with section 149 of the Indian Penal Code was registered.