(1.) Special leave granted. We have heard counsel for the parties. The explanation for delay in presentation of the special leave petition is accepted. Delay condoned.
(2.) Appellant was a Peon in respondent I-Bank and was removed from service following a disciplinary proceeding. The Board of Revenue-respondent 2 after hearing parties came to the finding that termination of service was not justified and by its order dated August 20, 1981, held:
(3.) The Board of Revenue by its order found that the charge of the appellant hurling abusive words has not been proved and the residuary charge of the appellant's refusal to accept the letter was not such a serious one which justified the punishment of removal from service. The appellant was ordered to be restored to service with back wages.