DAISY Vs. STATE OF KERALA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These two appeals by certificate arise out of a common judgment of the Kerala High Court disposing of the claim for enhancement of compensation made by the appellants in respect of three plots of land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court allowed enhancement in respect of two of the plots and the appellants before us claim further enhancement not only in respect of these two plots but also in respect of the other plot in respect of which no enhancement was allowed by the High Court.

(2.) The plot 67/1A-4 abuts the main Kottayam-Kumili road. Plot 67/ 1A-1 which lies at some distance north of 67/1A-4 abuts on a road of such less importance while plots 67/1A-2 and 67/2 have no road frontage. The largest plot 67/1A-2 is practically a hillside, one side of the plot being 70 ft. higher than the other side and on an average the slope of the land is 1 in 6. This is however not an uncommon feature in the neighbourhood which is hilly with slopping roads and houses built thereon at different levels by the creation of terraces. The appellant in Appeal No.1010/1967 claimed compensation at the rate of Rs. 750/-per cent for the entire plot 67/1A-1. The appellant in the other appeal claimed at the rate of Rs. 750/- per cent in respect of two plots 67/1A-2 and 67/2 which are contiguous and at the rate of Rs. 1200/- per cent in respect of 45 cents numbering 67/1A-4. The Land Acquisition Collector awarded Rupees 200/- per cent to the appellant in Appeal No. 1011/1967 and Rs. 180/- per cent in respect of the larger plot of 255 cents and Rs. 226/- per cent in respect of the plot of 45 cents. The District Court disposed of the applications under S. 18 of the Act by enhancing the rate of compensation to Rs. 325/- per cent with regard to the first plot, Rs. 250/- per cent with regard to the second plot and Rupees 350/- with regard to the third plot. The High Court enhanced the compensation by Rs. 25/- per cent in respect of the first plot, and by Rs. 400/-per cent in the case of the third plot but left unaffected the compensation with regard to the largest plot.

(3.) Before the High Court the appellants relied on seven documents Exs. P-1 to P-7 as also a judgment of the High Court in A. S. No. 537 of 1961 in respect of land which was contiguous to the appellants' land. Before us learned counsel for the appellant sought to rely principally on Ex. P-7 and the judgment in A. S. 537/1961. P-7 was a judgment of the District Court . Kottayam concerning acquisition of a piece of land on the northern side of the Civil Lines Kottayam which is situate quite close to the appellants' lands. In respect of the western portion of the said property the District Judge awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 1,000/-per cent. The High Court refused to be guided by Ex. P-7 observing that no attempt had been made before it to compare the relative importance of the land involved in Ex. P-7 and that in the appeals before it. The High Court further commented that: