(1.) There is little substance in this appeal by certificate under Article 133 (1) (a) of the Constitution.
(2.) The facts of this case are as follows:
(3.) The two questions that have been primarily canvassed before us are:(1) that the lease in favour of the appellants is a valid lease and therefore the lease in favour of respondents 1 and 2 is invalid and (2) that the suit was barred by limitation.