REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

UNION OF INDIA Appellant

V/S

Raj Grow Impex Llp Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

CHANCERY DIVISION IN FILMS ROVER INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND ORS. V. CANNON FILM SALES LTD. [REFERRED TO]
HORIZON FERRO ALLOYS PVT. LTD. AND ORS. V. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
SHEIKH MOHAMMAD OMER VS. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS CALCUTTA [REFERRED TO]
SANT RAJ VS. O P SINGLA [REFERRED TO]
HARGOVIND DAS K JOSHI VS. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS [REFERRED TO]
DORAB CAWASJI WARDEN VS. COOMI SORAB WARDEN [REFERRED TO]
U P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS. MOHAMMAD ISMAIL [REFERRED TO]
S B INTERNATIONAL LIMITED VS. ASSTT DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE [REFERRED TO]
P T R EXPORTS MADRAS PVT LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
GARG WOOLLEN MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED VS. ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS NEW DELHI [REFERRED TO]
OM PRAKASH BHATIA VS. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS NEW DELHI [REFERRED TO]
RELIANCE AIRPORT DEVLOPERS PVT LTD VS. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM NEW DELHI VS. BROOKS INTERNATIONAL [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT), MUMBAI VS. FINESSE CREATION INC [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS VS. M/S. ATUL AUTOMATIONS PVT. LTD. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) In this set of appeals, the Union of India and the authorities related with customs have questioned the orders dated 15.10.2020 and 05.01.2021, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition (L) Nos. 3502-3503 of 2020 and Writ Petition (ST) No. 24 of 2021 respectively[1]. The appellants are essentially aggrieved of the directions issued by the High Court for compliance of the orders-in-original dated 28.08.2020 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Customs, Group-I, Mumbai and consequently, for release of the goods imported by the private respondents though the goods in question are, according to the appellants, liable to absolute confiscation.

(3.) The genesis of the present litigation lies in the notifications issued by the Central Government under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992[2] as also the consequential trade notices issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade[3], making provisions for restricting the import of certain beans, peas and pulses.

Click here to view full judgment.

UNION OF INDIA Vs. RAJ GROW IMPEX LLP

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address