LAWS(SC)-2021-11-124

GPR POWER SOLUTIONS PVT LTD. Vs. SUPRIYO CHAUDHURI

Decided On November 29, 2021
Gpr Power Solutions Pvt Ltd. Appellant
V/S
Supriyo Chaudhuri Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal under Sec. 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, hereinafter referred to as the 'IBC' is against a judgment and order dtd. 15/9/2021 passed by the Principal Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal at New Delhi, hereinafter referred to as the 'NCLAT' dismissing the appeal being Company Appeal (AT) (INS.) No.743 of 2021 filed by the Appellant against an order dtd. 9/7/2021 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench), in CP (IB) No. 1214/KB/2018 whereby the learned Adjudicating Authority dismissed IA/344(KB)/2021 filed by the Appellant seeking condonation of delay in filing its claim of Rs.1,13,38,651.00 against the Corporate Debtor (the Respondent No.3) before the Resolution Professional.

(2.) The Appellant carries on business of Supply and Erection of Piping Systems. On or about 25/4/2012 the Respondent No.3 being the Corporate Debtor contacted the Appellant at its office at Chennai, and placed Purchase Order No.C212425-001 on the Appellant for design, supply, erection and testing of LP piping system and the commissioning of an LDO (Light Diesel Oil) storage handling system for its IX 67.5 MW Power Plant (Unit-II) at Industrial Growth, Kolinga Nagar, Rabana, Post- Jakhapura, Odisha, for a consideration of Rs.5,37,75,761.00 excluding taxes and duties. Later, the Corporate Debtor amended the said purchase order, to include additional work of the value of Rs.88,64,239.00 excluding taxes and duties.

(3.) The Appellant contends that the Corporate Debtor failed and neglected to pay a sum of Rs.76,85,472.00 due and payable to the Appellant in connection with the purchase order referred to above. The Appellant was therefore, constrained to invoke the Arbitration Clause in the contract between the Appellant and the Corporate Debtor.