REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

SURINDER KUMAR Appellant

V/S

STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V. KRISHNAMURTI LAXMIPATI NAIDU [REFERRED TO]
SURAJDEO OJHA V. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
KAKE SINGH V. STATE OF M.P. [REFERRED TO]
NANHAU RAM V. STATE OF M.P. [REFERRED TO]
RASHEED BEG VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
MUNNU RAJA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
K RAMACHANDRA REDDY VS. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [REFERRED TO]
RAM MANORATH CHHOTEY VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
MOHANLAL GANGARAM GEHANI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
RAMAWATI DEVI VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. RAM SAGAR YADAV [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. MADAN MOHAN [REFERRED TO]
PANIBEN VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
SHAM SHANKAR KANKARIA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
S PANNEERSELVAM VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
PURAN CHAND VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 19.12.2003 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 241-DBA of 1993 whereby the High Court while reversing the judgment dated 17.12.1992 passed by the Sessions Judge, Ambala allowed the appeal filed by the State and convicted the Appellant herein under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short Indian Penal Code) and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.

(2.) Brief facts:

(3.) Heard Mr. Sushil Kumar, learned senior counsel for the Appellant-accused and Mr. Manjit Singh, learned Additional Advocate General for the Respondent-State.

Click here to view full judgment.

SURINDER KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address