LAWS(SC)-2011-9-44

NTPC LTD Vs. M P STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

Decided On September 29, 2011
NTPC LTD Appellant
V/S
M P STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) All these five appeals arise out of a common order dated 20.4.2007 passed by Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Tribunal for short) while deciding the First Appeals to the Appellate Tribunal under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 against the orders of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (The Central Commission for short), dated 1.4.2005, 7.4.2005 and 2.6.2006 passed under Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003. While admitting these appeals, this Court has stayed the operation of the impugned order until further orders.

(2.) M/s NTPC Ltd. is a power generating company within the definition of the concept under Section 2(28) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Electricity Boards concerned, receive the power generated from the thermal power plants of NTPC situated at Kawas, Gandhar and Rihand. The Central Commission had determined the tariff payable by the Electricity Boards to NTPC by the above referred orders dated 1.4.2005, 7.4.2005 and 2.6.2006.

(3.) The Central Commission while determining the tariff, had determined the final tariff at a rate lesser than the pre-existing tariff, as a result of which NTPC was found to have collected excess amounts during this intervening period, and the Electricity Boards became entitled to get the refund/adjustment of these differential amounts. Thus, the amount overcharged in respect of Gandhar power station is to the tune of Rs. 460.52 crores and the one in respect of Kawas power station is Rs. 254.47 crores. The Central Commission had however disallowed the claim of the Electricity Boards for payment of interest on the differential amounts between (i) the tariff finally determined by the Central Commission and (ii) the pre-existing tariff continued by the Central Commission until the final determination of the tariff. There is no dispute that thereafter NTPC has duly and immediately adjusted the excess amounts in favour of the purchaser Electricity Boards in their subsequent bills.