KAZI RAJIYUDDIN Vs. KAZI MEER C GAYASUDDIN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) Appellants filed a revision petition under article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order passed in execution of a decree. That order was dated 5-4-90. It was pointed out by the order side that appellant did not mention about a subsequent order dated 17- 4-90 by which the earlier order dated 5-4-90 was modified. Learned single Judge took serious note of non-production of the order dated 17-4-90 and termed it as suppression of a very material fact and it was on that ground that the writ petition was dismissed and not on merits.

(3.) We directed the appellant to produce before us the order dated 17-4-90 to verify how far that order would have modified the earlier order dated 5-4-90. We hereby extract the order dated 17-4-90.