LAWS(SC)-2001-10-102

CANARA BANK Vs. STANDERED CHARTERED BANK

Decided On October 30, 2001
CANARA BANK Appellant
V/S
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is an appeal against the decision of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transaction in Securities) Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as "the Special Court"). According to the decree the Special Court found that a sum of Rs. 60,64,71,275.12p. was payable by the appellant to the respondent who was also held entitled to interest at the rate of 20 per cent per annum from 25th November, 1991, till the payment of the decretal amount. Costs were also awarded in favour of the respondent. We are informed that the decretal amount including the costs have been paid to the respondent by 1995.

(2.) The respondent had filed a suit against the appellant basing dues on three transaction which had taken place between them. On 23-8-1991 the appellant purchased Government of India securities 2008-A of face value of Rs. 10 crores at the rate of Rs. 101.50 and on 26-8-1991 it purchased similar securities of the face value of Rs. 7 crores at the rate of Rs. 101.50 and a similar transaction was entered into on 14-9-1991 where security of face value of Rs. 43 crores was purchased at the rate of Rs. 101.50. In this manner, securities of the face value of Rs. 60 crores were purchased from the appellant by the respondent.

(3.) The payment for the aforesaid was made and in lieu thereof the appellant-Bank delivered to the respondent three cost memos and 3 SGL transfer forms. When these transfer forms were presented to the RBI they were returned because the account of the appellant with the Reserve Bank did not show that the said SGL forms could be honoured. These SGLs were presented twice again but without success. Ultimately, it is an admitted case, that the respondent did receive SGLs of the face value of Rs. 1.61 crores. The suit which was filed was for Rs. 58.39 crores plus interest thereon. Written statement was filed and one of the main pleas which was taken was that the account had been squared off. On the pleas of the parties 21 issues were framed which were as follows :-