SANTI DEB BERMA Vs. KANCHAN PRAVADEVI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Gauhati High Court rendered in Criminal Appeal No. 16/75 convicting the appellant under S.494, I.P.C. and sentencing him to imprisonment till raising of the Court and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,500/ -, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months with a direction that out of the fine amount, if collected, a sum of Rs. 1,000/ - should be paid to the complainant. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-

(2.) The convicted accused preferred an appeal before the Additional Sessions Judge, Tripura West. The learned Sessions Judge acquitted all the accused persons inclusive of the appellant. It was as against the order of the said acquittal, a criminal appeal was preferred before the High Court, which rendered the impugned judgment convicting the appellant alone under S. 494, I.P.C. and, sentencing him as aforementioned. Hence the present appeal.

(3.) Admittedly, the parties to this proceeding are all Hindus. The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted the appellant and others mainly on the ground that there was no specific evidence regarding the performance of the essential rite - namely - Saptapadi in regard to the second marriage. The relevant portion of the finding of the Additional Sessions Judge reads thus: