N CHANDRAMOULI Vs. CHIKKALAKKAIAH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The only question raised in this appeal relates to the seniority of one of two groups of candidates in the Karnataka State. We must make it perfectly plain that we are concerned only with the specific rules placed before us and limit the operation of our observations to these rules and orders - no wider import or impact is available nor do we intend to affect other States and other services governed by other systems or rules.

(2.) The Karnataka State, on States Reorganisation, was composed of various territories drawn from various former States including what is known as the old Mysore State. May Government servants from those States were allotted to the Karnataka State on 1-11-56, the date of the State Reorganisation. There was a gradation list prepared in regard to the allottees coming from various former States, and the Central Government, acting under its power under S. 115 (7), sanctioned a final gradation list for the Karnataka State also. As per that list, the employees already regularized before 1-11-56 were put above temporary servants for the obvious reason that temporary hands would take their place below the regular hands. Nevertheless, those temporary hands were also included in the gradation list of the Karnataka State, because they had rendered continuous service, although on an officiating basis.

(3.) Subsequently, new appointments were made to the services by the Karnataka State and those appointees, who came by recruitment through the Public Service Commission, were undoubtedly regular hands. The question arose whether those subsequent recruits, coming into the Public Services after 1-11-56, could claim seniority over those who had been included in the gradation list as on 1-11-56. The Government passed an order dated 22nd September, 1961, the material part of which runs thus: