RACHPAL MAHRAJ Vs. BHAGWANDAS DARUKA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal arises out of a suit brought by the respondents against the appellant and other members of his joint family to enforce a mortgage alleged to have been created by the appellant by deposit of his joint family to enforce a mortgage alleged to have been created by the appellant by deposit of title deeds on 23rd October 1936 at Calcutta.

(2.) The short point for determination in the appeal is whether the memorandum signed and delivered by the appellant on 23rd October 1936 and relied upon by the respondents as evidencing the creation of the mortgage was compulsorily registrable under S.17, Registration Act, 1908, and, not having been registered, was inadmissible in evidence to prove the mortgage. The Subordinate Judge of Darbhanga who tried the suit, and the High Court at Patna on appeal, held that the document did not require registration and was admissible in evidence, and accordingly decreed the suit.

(3.) The question turns on the proper construction of the memorandum and the circumstances under which it was delivered to the respondents. According to the evidence of the respondents' witnesses which has been accepted by the Courts below, the accounts relating to the appellant's dealings were examined on 23rd October 1936 and a large sum was found due to the respondents who demanded payment. The appellant thereupon brought and gave certain documents, being title deeds relating to immovable properties belonging to his family, for the purpose of being held as security for the amounts then due and to become due on further dealings. A draft of the memorandum was thereafter prepared which the appellant took with him to be shown to his lawyer and he returned in the afternoon, and signed and delivered it to the respondents. All this took place in Calcutta. The memorandum is in the form of a letter addressed to the respondents' firm and is in the following terms :