REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Shah Faesal Appellant

V/S

UNION OF INDIA Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

STREET TRAMWAYS V. LONDON COUNTY COUNCIL [REFERRED TO]
QUINN V. LEATHEM [REFERRED TO]
RADCLIFFE V. RIBBEL MOTOR SERVICE LTD [REFERRED TO]
PREM NATH KAUL FOR SELF AND ON BEHALF OF OTHER MEMBERS OF THE KASHMIR AGRICULTURISTS ASSOCIATION SRINAGAR VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
SAMPAT PRAKASH S K B REHMAN S NIZAMUDDIN VS. STATE OF FAMMU AND KASHMIR:STATE OF FAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD MAQBOOL DAMNOO VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
A R ANTULAY VS. R S NAYAK [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB LAND DEVELOPMENT AND RECLAMATION CORPORATION LIMITED CHANDIGARH DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AMRAVATI REGIONAL MANAGER WEST ZONE NOW KNOWN AS KANPUR REGION BANK OF BARODA REGIONAL OFFICE LUCKNOW VS. PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT CHANDIGARH:CHANDRASHEKHAR MARIBHAU DESHMUKH :SECRETARY U P BANK EMPLOYEES UNION C O BANK OF BARODA LATOUCHE ROAD KANPUR :LABOUR COURT RANCHI:NAMDEO:SECRETA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. DHANWANTI DEVI [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRA PRAKASH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SARLA VERMA VS. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION [REFERRED TO]
SANTOSH DEVI VS. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD [REFERRED TO]
SUNDEEP KUMAR BAFNA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. SANTOSH GUPTA AND ANR. ETC. [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VS. PRANAY SETHI [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These cases pertain to the constitutional challenge before this Court as regards to two Constitution Orders issued by the President of India in exercise of his powers under Article 370 of the Constitution of India.

(2.) At the outset, learned senior counsel appearing for one of the Petitioners in W.P. (C) No. 1013/19 and Petitioner in W.P. (C) 1368/19 raised the contention that the present matter needs to be referred to a larger Bench as there were contrary opinions by two different Constitution Benches on the interpretation of Article 370 of the Constitution. This order is confined to the limited preliminary issue of whether the matter should be referred to a larger Bench. We have not considered any issue on the merits of the dispute.

(3.) A brief introduction to the issue to set the context for this order is that after the late Maharaja of Kashmir had entered into a treaty of accession with the Indian State, Article 370 was incorporated into the Indian Constitution, which states as follows:

Click here to view full judgment.

SHAH FAESAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address