A.MAHALAKSHMI Vs. BALA VENKATRAM

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 24.04.2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in CRP (NPD) No. 2898/2013, by which the High Court has allowed the said revision application preferred by the respondents herein ­ original defendants, the original plaintiff has preferred the present appeal.

(2.) The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under:

(3.) Shri Aniruddha Joshi, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the original plaintiff ­ landlady has vehemently submitted that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court has committed a grave error in quashing and setting aside the eviction decree on the ground of subletting. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant has vehemently submitted that the High Court has committed a grave error in holding that the landlady has not established and proved the subletting by the original tenant in favour of respondent no.2 herein ­ sub tenant.