SHILPA AGGARWAL Vs. AVIRAL MITTAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By our order dated 9th December, 2009, we had disposed of Criminal Appeal No. 2357 of 2009, arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 5995 of 2009, without interfering with the order of the High Court impugned in the appeal. In order to ensure that the directions of the High Court were complied with by the parties, we had directed the Respondent-husband to provide the initial expenses of the Appellant-wife and her minor child for travelling to and staying in the United Kingdom for at least a month to attend and contest the proceedings initiated by the Respondent No. 1 husband before the Court of Justice, Family Division, U.K. We had also directed the matter to be listed for further orders on 15th December, 2009, to enable the Respondent-husband to submit a proposal for the travel and staying arrangements for the Appellant and her minor daughter in the U.K. for at least a month.

(2.) Pursuant to the said order, a proposal was duly filed by the Respondent-husband on 15th December, 2009, but finding the same to be inadequate, we had directed the Respondent-husband to give a detailed proposal with regard to the said arrangements. The Appellant was also directed to file a proposal as to how she intended to work out the order which had been passed on 9th December, 2009. The matter was, accordingly, listed on 29th January, 2010, to consider the fresh proposals to be made by the Respondent-husband and the views of the Appellant-wife in respect thereof.

(3.) By his application dated 23.12.2009 and filed on 12th January, 2010, the Respondent-husband, inter alia, indicated as follows: