T.T. INDUSTRIES Vs. HARJEET KAUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ON hearing Mr. Saurabh Suman Sinha, counsel for the appellant at some length, we are satisfied that the Intellectual Property Appellate Board rightly came to the conclusion that there was no similarity between the registered trade mark of the appellant and the mark applied for registration by the respondents and there was no scope of any deception or confusion between the two.

(2.) WE find no infirmity in the order of the Board and see no scope of interference in the matter. The appeal is dismissed.

(3.) THE apprehension is misconcieved as this order is passed in this particular case and it does not relate to any other proceedings.