LAWS(SC)-2010-2-36

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs. BALRAM MIHANI

Decided On February 01, 2010
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appellant
V/S
Balram Mihani And Ors Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By our earlier order dated 19.01.2010, we have dismissed the appeals filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh. Now, we proceed to give reasons thereof.

(2.) The Station House Officer, Itarsi moved applications before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Itarsi for initiating proceedings against the respondents herein under Chapter VII-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "the Code") for attachment and forfeiture of the properties of the respondents. According to the applications, the said properties were derived from or used in commission of offences and were acquired from the criminal activities. The police further urged that the respondents were involved in the criminal activities since long and had accumulated huge wealth derived directly or indirectly by or such criminal and unlawful activities. According to the police some of these properties were in the names of their relatives which were clearly traceable to the respondents herein. The prayer thus was made under Section 105D of the Code for authorization to take all necessary steps to trace out and identify such properties and further for the forfeiture and vesting thereof. Some other applications were also filed on identical facts against some other respondents also. The Trial Court having passed an order in pursuance of these applications allowing the same, the respondents challenged the same by way of a petition under Section 482 of the Code. Finding that there were divergent opinions on the tenability of the applications amongst two learned Single Judges of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the matter was referred to the Division Bench and the Division Bench by the impugned order quashed the proceedings holding that the provisions of Chapter VII-A were not applicable to such local offences complained of. It is this order which is in challenge before us at the instance of the State Government in these appeals.

(3.) Shri Dushyant A. Dave, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the State of Madhya Pradesh very painstakingly took us through Chapter VII-A containing Sections 105A to 105L. It will be useful to see the import of some of the Sections.