REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

MOHD.YUNUS KHAN Appellant

V/S

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. MOHAMMAD NOOH [REFERRED TO]
MINERAL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
BACHHITTAR SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
INDIA MARINE SERVICE PRIVATE LIMITED VS. THEIR WORKMEN [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ASSAM VS. BIMAL KUMAR PANDIT [REFERRED TO]
MEENGLAS TEA ESTATE VS. WORKMEN [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MYSORE VS. K MANOHE GOWDA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. H C GOEL [REFERRED TO]
S PARTHASARATHI VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
NAWABKHAN ABBASKHAN VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
RAJA JAGDAMBKA PRATAP NARAIN SINGH VS. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES [REFERRED TO]
MANEKA GANDHI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
LT COL PRITHI PAL SINGH BEDI CAPT DHARAM PAL KUKRETY GAPT CHANDER KUMAR CHOPRA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
R VISWAN MRS NIRMAL CHHIBBAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
ARJUN CHAUBEY VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
ANIL KUMAR VS. PRESIDING OFFICER [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK KUMAR YADAV STATE OF HARYANA D R CHAUDHARY MEMBER VS. STATE OF HARYANA:SUBHASH CHANDER SHARMA:ASHOK KUMAR YADAV [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT DEPTT MADRAS VS. MUNUSWAMY MUDALIAR [REFERRED TO]
RATTAN LAL SHARMA VS. MANAGING COMMITTEE DR HARI RAM CO EDUCATION HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL [REFERRED TO]
KRISHANLAL VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
TILAK CHAND MAGATRAM OBHAN VS. KAMALA PRASAD SHUKLA [REFERRED TO]
STATE BANK OF PATIALA VS. S K SHARMA [REFERRED TO]
COLOUR CHEM LIMITED VS. A L ALASPURKAR [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. MUSTAFA AND NAJIBAI TRADING CO [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. L D BALAM SINGH [REFERRED TO]
DIRECT GENERAL RPF VS. SAI BABU [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT FORGE CO LTD VS. UTTAM MANOHAR NAKATE [REFERRED TO]
VISHNU DUTT VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
GOVT OF AP VS. MOHD TAHER ALI [REFERRED TO]
MONI SHANKAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. PRAKASH KUMAR TANDON [REFERRED TO]
A U KURESHI VS. HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. BISHAMBER DAS [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 12th July, 2007 passed by the High Court of Allahabad (Lucknow Bench), dismissing the Writ Petition No. 782 of 2007 filed by the appellant against the judgment and order of the U.P. State Public Services Tribunal, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') Lucknow dated 25th May, 2007, by which the Tribunal dismissed the Claim Petition No. 837 of 2003 filed by the appellant and upheld the order of dismissal of the appellant from service by the Statutory Authorities.

(3.) Facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that the appellant was appointed as a Constable in the Provincial Armed Constabulary (hereinafter referred to as 'PAC') on 10th February, 1969 and promoted to the post of Head Constable vide order dated 5th May, 1983. The appellant was posted with 30th Battalion PAC in G- Company in the year 2002. On 29th September, 2002, the appellant was on duty as Guard Commander along with another Head Constable named Rama Nand. At around 6.20 A.M., the appellant left his post and came back after 25 minutes after having tea and medicine in the canteen. His departure from his post was duly recorded in the register maintained for the purpose by the other guard, Head Constable Rama Nand. The Dal Nayak endorsed his comments in respect of the appellant's absence for the period of 25 minutes and placed it before the Commandant on 3rd October, 2002. The Commandant vide order dated 4th October, 2002 imposed the punishment of 10 days punishment drill. Upon protest by the appellant, the Commandant enhanced the punishment to 10 days confinement in a cell. The appellant refused to serve the punishment being not acceptable to him.

Click here to view full judgment.

MOHD YUNUS KHAN Vs. STATE OF UP

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address