GANGABISHAN Vs. MOTIRAM

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

(3.) The suit of the appellant filed in the civil court has been held to be debarred on account of Section 36-A of the Bombay Prevention of fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the High Court did not consider (he provisions contained in Section 36-B of the said Act which is reproduced below: