(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The case involves a settlement of the money claim during the pendency of a criminal appeal arising out of proceedings under S. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The main appeal, namely, Criminal Appeal No. 59/99, against the conviction is pending before the VIth Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad in the matter arising under S. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. That is an appeal against the order dated 8-2-1999 of the XVth Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, sentencing the appellant No. 2, representing the firm, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 months and further to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- or in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of 3 months. There is also a direction against the 2nd appellant representing the 1st appellant-Company, to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- or in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months. The appeal against the conviction and sentence is pending as aforesaid, before the VIth Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad.
(3.) At that stage, it appears that some interlocutory applications were filed by the appellants in the appellate Court and the said applications were dismissed. Against the said order, a revision case No. 91/2000 was filed in the High Court and it was also dismissed. This appeal has been preferred against the said order passed by the High Court in the interlocutory proceedings.