(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) A notice in contempt had been issued by the High Court to the Appellant. However by an order made on 19.1.99 the Rule in that matter was discharged. The High Court nevertheless proceeded to make the order in the following terms thereby by giving several directions to the parties in the matter:
(3.) It is this portion of the order that is under challenge. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submitted that having discharged the Appellant the proceedings stood terminated and hence there is no question of issuing directions by the High Court; that when the Court is no longer seized of the 'his' travelled far beyond scope of the contempt proceeding. We find great force in this submission.