LAWS(SC)-2000-8-128

MAHINDER KAUR Vs. TEJA SINGH

Decided On August 25, 2000
MANINDER KAUR Appellant
V/S
TEJA SINGH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Leave granted.

(2.) In a case instituted on complaint with the allegation that the appellants have committed the offence including Sec. 302 read with Sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code, learned single Judge of the High Court has cancelled the bail granted to the appellants as per the impugned order. The appellants remained on bail from 11-12-97 till the date of cancellation i. e. 6-8-99. In the meanwhile trial was posted and it proceeded to some extent. The High Court appears to have considered the merits of the case and deemed it necessary to set aside the order granting bail. The basic premise that the case was instituted on complaint had been overlooked by the high Court. Normally, when a case is instituted on a complaint the Court issues summons to the accused to appear in the court and on such appearance, instead of being arrested, he would apply for bail. Unless there are compelling reasons, the court would allow the accused to remain on bail, at least till the charge is framed. Even after charge is framed the situation would be reconsidered if necessary whether bail should be cancelled or not. We do not think that the High Court should have expressed on the merits of the case particularly when the matter had to go for trial. We are now told that some witnesses were examined in the trial Court. The appellants can remain on bail. during the remaining period of trial subject to the condition that they shall not prevent witnesses from coming forward to give evidence or that the accused shall not tamper with the evidence. If the prosecution feels that the appellants are not complying with the said condition it is open to the prosecution to move for the cancellation of the bail and if the Court is satisfied that the above condition is not complied with by the appellants it is open to the Sessions Court or the High Court to cancel the bail. Subject to the above observations we set aside the impugned order and allow the appellants to remain on bail pursuant to the bond already executed by them.

(3.) The appeal is disposed of. Order accordingly.